Electronic Arts may have ended its odious online pass policy, but GameStop still is on the hook. A judge will allow a lawsuit to go forward with allegations GameStop didnât disclose the hidden cost of downloadable content. The plaintiff has also sued Subway for making 11-inch sandwiches and selling them as footlongs.
https://lastchance.cc/ea-getting-rid-of-online-passes-507021364%3C/a%3E%3C/p%3E
Farley, noted the Inquirer, also sued Subway earlier this year for making 11-inch sandwiches and calling them one foot long. Two other plaintiffs are part of the suit, but, interestingly, they bought EA Sports games that predated the labelâs âonline passâ policy, which put online multiplayer and other features behind a one-use code. That was introduced with Tiger Woods PGA Tour 11 in 2010. Electronic Arts earlier this year said it was doing away with online passesâall of them, not just for new games, but existing ones as wellâsaying it was heeding consumer feedback about the policy.
Online passesâwhich other publishers have employed (in sports, THQ introduced them first with UFC Undisputed 2010)âessentially give a publisher a cut from a used game sale. As a one-use code, the original owner of a game is assumed to use the one included with the game for free. When he resells it, anyone who buys that copy must then pay $10 or $15âto the publisher, through an online service like Xbox Liveâto access whatever features the code delivers. Farleyâs lawsuit contends this potential cost was not made apparent to used-games buyers.
https://lastchance.cc/thq-raises-price-of-online-multiplayer-pass-to-10-5618155%3C/a%3E%3C/p%3E
Video Game Suit Can Proceed [Philadelphia Inquirer]