The endlessly silly debacle between Microsoft and Sony, regarding the formerâs attempt to buy Activision Blizzard King, offers us a new lowlight every day. Yesterday we had Microsoft declaring that it has rubbish exclusive titles compared to Sony, and today Sony has just loudly dissed EAâs Battlefield franchise in an effort to prove how much better Call of Duty performs.
Itâs all part of an ongoing effort to demonstrate that one of the worldâs biggest console manufacturers shouldnât own one of the worldâs biggest game publishers, whichâyou knowâsounds like a bad idea. But as Sony and Microsoft endlessly debase themselves and others to try to win a Whoâs Worst argument, it seems nothing is sacred. Hence the PlayStation ownerâs astonishing declaration to the UKâs Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) that EAâs Battlefield would be a poor substitute were it to lose access to the Call of Duty franchise.
âCall of Duty is not replicable,â says Sonyâs filing to the CMA, as reported by The Verge. âCall of Duty is too entrenched for any rival, no matter how well equipped, to catch up.â Explaining that itâs been the top-selling game âalmostâ every year for the last decade, it says that âother publishers do not have the resources or expertise to match its success.â Now, that all sounds a touch spurious, given that at one point the Medal of Honor series outsold Call of Duty, but itâs certainly true that in terms of a brand, CoD has everything else beat. But to drive that point home, Sony waits for an oncoming bus and then shoves hard:
To give a concrete example, Electronic Artsâone of the largest third-party developers after Activisionâhas tried for many years to produce a rival to Call of Duty with its Battlefield series. Despite the similarities between Call of Duty and Battlefieldâand despite EAâs track record in developing other successful AAA franchises (such as FIFA, Mass Effect, Need For Speed, and Star Wars: Battlefront)âthe Battlefield franchise cannot keep up.
Sony adds that Battlefieldâs latest entryâthe comparable miss of 2042âsold âjustâ 88.7 million copies, compared to CoDâs 400 million.
Microsoft has repeatedly insisted that Call of Duty would not become an Xbox exclusive, as recently as yesterday explaining how Activisionâs behemoth would remain cross-platform, while Elder Scrolls will not, although based on the utter nonsense that Starfield is a precarious new IP and, um, Fallout 76 is âniche.â So, you can understand why Sony might not take them at their word.
At the same time, not selling CoD to half your current player-base would be incredibly stupid, and while some people might shift from PlayStation to Xbox to keep playing the annual shooter, it isnât going to be 200 million
Oh, honestly, I donât care. The stupid, childish nonsense is making a lot of lawyers incredibly rich, unimaginable millions being spaffed away while the companyâs customers are wondering how theyâre going to keep the heating on this winter. But I really do hope that so much of these ridiculous âwoe is usâ statements come back to bite both console makers on the ass.
Â