Yesterday, the president of Twitch, Dan Clancy, announced a change to the revenue system that would mean some of the top performing Twitch streamers will get less money. According to Clancy, Twitch was making this change in order to afford increasing server costs.The changes would not affect âthe vast majorityâ of creators, but the blog post upset those who felt that Twitch was taking too much money and offering too little support.
Previously, Twitchâowned by Amazonâhad offered a special 70/30 revenue split for content creators who grew their viewership, while most streamers split their revenue 50/50 with the platform. The changes would keep the 70/30 ratio on the first $100,000 for those who were grandfathered into this better deal, but beyond this, every dollar above that amount would be split evenly with Twitch. Clancy acknowledged that 22,000 creators have asked Twitch to move everyone to the 70/30 mode, but said the company wonât move in that direction, because Amazon Web Services cost too much money. Kotaku reached out to Twitch to ask if theyâre being overcharged by their own sister company, but did not receive a response by the time of publication.
How to understand this is: the top 500 creators will earn 29% less revenue per subscriber after reaching $100,000 earned in a year. No other Twitch streamer will be effected. More alarming in this post is Twitch saying they can't afford the run the website. Explanation below. https://t.co/VFm6ZSvgvX
â Devin (@DevinNash) September 21, 2022
As some streamers have pointed out, server costs feel like a flimsy excuse when both AWS and Twitch are owned by Amazon, one of the highest earning companies in the world. And it feels especially bittersweet that Twitch is moving in the opposite direction of what thousands of revenue earners had asked for.
One Apex Legends streamer made a parody video about why creators were pissed about Twitch even before they tried to increase revenue by taking a slice from their subscriptions.
Welcome to Twitch. pic.twitter.com/MedOvAEKMv
â Big E (@Big_E) September 21, 2022
âHere at Twitch, we believe in manipulating our creators into thinking Twitch is the only place where you can be successful,â said Aaron, known as Big E. âWe do this by giving everyone a false sense of hope: an easy path to affiliationâŠThis is of course to hook you in, so you can spend four years of your life grinding for Twitch Partner.â He pointed out that the partner program didnât provide additional benefits, and that the company relied on streamers becoming big on a different platform before bringing their audience to Twitch. âFeel like youâre being screwed here? Thatâs okay. Because you are.â
https://twitter.com/embed/status/1572626040144678912
Even the former head of gaming at YouTube wanted to weigh in. âRegardless of size, the creator should be getting a disproportionate amountâthis shouldnât even be up for debate,â said Ryan Wyatt on Twitter. âThe real focus should be increasing viewership across the platform to scale ad dollars.â Ouch. Itâs definitely a little embarrassing to be getting hot business tips from someone who used to work for your main competitor!
If all streamers upset about the sub split decrease cancelled going to Twitchcon it would make a bold statement, and cost twitch a lot.
The fake âtwitch cares about creator successâ has been dropped, so itâs time to show that this is a two-way street.
Streamers should organize.
â Shannon đšđŠ (@shannonplante) September 21, 2022
Streamers are trying to send a message to Twitch that their revenue changes are not okay. Shannon Plante tweeted that her fellow streamers should boycott Twitchcon, and to consider a walkout like Pokimane did.
âStreamers should organize,â she said.